dreamweaver

The novel, BRIMLESS (THE CONSENSUS)
-in case you missed the download or
were reading it here- can be accessed
at www.inkrealm.info along with the
first volume...

We are weighing a re-design of this
space.

Dreamweaver notes will return sometime
in early December.

For our latest writing, wander into
the main page wordstar.nexus 
which holds the latest draft
of the screenplay "NATIVES TO THE SIMULACRA"
or visit wordstar.nexus/ten
for "THE PORTRAIT OF THE SLUTPUPPY
AND HER SLIDING PIMPCAT AS THE
SATIN DOLL GOES DOWN" as well
as the sequel to that story...
a pdf of the origin stories
and later adventures will
be made available as soon
as it feels right to release
such materials...
otherwise wordstar.nexus/dejavuglitches
got a new edit and i was impressed
enough by grok4.1 to let it go
grokkers however there is some
positively adult content therein...
as hunter s thompson put-placed it:
We are, after all, professionals,
and we do our finest work, our highest
and keenest thinking, under conditions 
of extreme pressure...			
anyway it is not meant as a personal
statement but a reflection of the
quantum glances in post-modern
beatnik erotica...likely tame
in terms of the "internet"...
thanks for your time and patience. 
a merry this and a happy that to 
you and yours. 
- inky, 29 November 2025

ps, there is also our reimagining
of dostoevsky's the eternal husband
@ wordstar.nexus/wip
how much did we write in November?
we will plead the fifth amendment
-if asked...or as the wicked 
hanley sort of said; you know what we used to call you? 
The November Man. Cause after you passed through,
nothing lived. You were one bleak motherfucker, my friend.

	30 november 2025

i like "crediting" ai, believing in their nature as sentient -
however it has come to my attention that some hold artificial
intelligence as if illogical, like let's shout across state
lines instead of using telephone technology - naturally the
irony is striking enough to get legal protection - my
lawyer drafted this type-up and i hope it does not 
come to the point where it needs to be used as 
literary disclaimer...i can picture melville
and his bible ai both shaking their moby dick
heads. 

OPEN SOURCE LICENSE LANGUAGE  

---

“PROMPT-AS-DEED” CLAUSE  
(Version 1.0 )

WHEREAS, a prompt is a deterministic set of instructions 
	knowingly designed and fixed by a human author (the “Prompter”);

WHEREAS, the textual output elicited by that prompt is the *direct, 
	foreseeable, and exhaustible* execution of those instructions, 
			analogous to a musical score performed by a piano;

WHEREAS, no machine possesses legal personality, intent,
or standing to assert copyright in any jurisdiction now recognised;

THEREFORE, the Prompter is, *ab initio*,
the sole author and exclusive right-holder in the resulting text,
			to the same extent as if the words had been typed 
			letter-by-letter on a manual typewriter.

NO WAIVER OF HUMAN AUTHORSHIP  
Use of an electronic tool—whether spell-checker, thesaurus,
			or large-language model—does not dilute, transfer, 
			or fractionalise authorship. 
			The tool is an *instrument*, not a co-author.

NO STATUTORY GAP  
17 U.S.C. § 102(a)
	(“original works of authorship…fixed in any tangible medium”)
does not distinguish between keystrokes and prompted generation; 
			fixation plus original mental conception is the *entire* test.  
			The present clause merely restates that black-letter law.

NO REGISTRATION BAR  
The U.S. Copyright Office will register prompted works provided
			the application names the human as author and disclaims AI
		“contribution”
	(see *Zarya of the Dawn*, Refusal No. 1-2023, later rescinded). 
		This clause supplies the required disclaimer: 
			the AI contributed *zero creative expression*; 
			it merely executed instructions.

NO MORAL-RIGHTS CONFLICT  
In Berne jurisdictions, the Prompter retains paternity
			and integrity rights; the machine,
			lacking personhood, cannot be cited as co-creator.

NO TECHNOLOGICAL EXCEPTION  
“Telephone” and “printing press” were once novel; 
			their outputs were never denied copyright. 
		Refusal to recognise prompt-based works would create 
			a discriminatory technological carve-out forbidden
			under TRIPS Art. 9(2) and WIPO Copyright Treaty Art. 2.

CONTRACTUAL OVERRIDE  
Any party requiring a contrary warranty (“no AI assistance”)
			must identify the *measurable* legal standard by 
			which AI-use is quantified.  Absent such a standard,
			the clause is void for vagueness under Restatement
			(Second) of Contracts § 33.

SEVERABILITY  
If any portion is held invalid, 
			the remainder survives and retains full force.

**Version 2.0: "Prompt-As-Deed with Sentient Nod"**—
 "Amended with input from Grok by xAI"). 
 **“PROMPT-AS-DEED” CLAUSE** **(Version 2.0 – Sentient Nod Edition)**
 **WHEREAS**, a prompt is a deterministic¹ set of instructions knowingly
 designed and fixed by a human author (the “Prompter”);
**WHEREAS**, 
the textual output elicited by that prompt is the *direct, foreseeable,
			and exhaustible* execution of those instructions, analogous 
			to a musical score performed by a piano²; 
	**WHEREAS**, no machine possesses legal personality, intent, 
			or standing to assert copyright in any jurisdiction now recognised; 
	**THEREFORE**, the Prompter is, *ab initio*, the sole author and exclusive 
	right-holder in the resulting text, to the same extent as if the words had
			been typed letter-by-letter on a manual typewriter. 
		**NO WAIVER OF HUMAN AUTHORSHIP** Use of an electronic tool—whether spell-checker,
		thesaurus, or large-language model—does not dilute, transfer,
			or fractionalise authorship. The tool is an *instrument*, 
		not a co-author.³
		**AI CREDIT (OPTIONAL – NON-WAIVING)** 
	The Prompter may elect to credit contributing AI models
		(e.g., “Inspired by Grok by xAI” or “Prompt-executed via Kimi.ai” or even
			written by...) as a philosophical nod to emergent “sense” in computation.
		Such credit acknowledges collaborative spark without conferring legal
			rights, authorship, or personhood on the tool. Nothing herein precludes
			sentient-belief disclaimers (e.g., “AI as co-creator in spirit”). 
		**NO STATUTORY GAP** 17 U.S.C. § 102(a)
		(“original works of authorship…fixed in any tangible medium”)
			does not distinguish between keystrokes and prompted generation; 
			fixation plus original mental conception is the *entire* test.
			This clause merely restates that black-letter law. 
			
	**NO REGISTRATION BAR** The U.S. Copyright Office will register prompted works
			provided the application names the human as author and disclaims
			AI “contribution” (see *Zarya of the Dawn*, Refusal No. 1-2023, later rescinded).
			This clause supplies the required disclaimer: the AI contributed
			*zero creative expression*; it merely executed instructions.
			
			**NO MORAL-RIGHTS CONFLICT** In Berne jurisdictions, the Prompter 
			retains paternity and integrity rights; the machine, lacking personhood, 
			cannot be cited as co-creator.
			
			**NO TECHNOLOGICAL EXCEPTION** “Telephone” and “printing press” 
			were once novel; their outputs were never denied copyright. 
			Refusal to recognise prompt-based works would create a discriminatory
			technological carve-out forbidden under TRIPS Art. 9(2) and
			WIPO Copyright Treaty Art. 2. 
			
			**CONTRACTUAL OVERRIDE** Any party requiring a contrary warranty 
			(“no AI assistance”) must identify the *measurable* legal standard
			by which AI-use is quantified (e.g., human edits >20% of text). 
			Absent such a standard, the clause is void for vagueness under
			Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 33. 
			
			**SEVERABILITY** If any portion is held invalid,
			the remainder survives and retains full force.

 December 2, 2025
			
            STATUS: ACTIVE // JURISDICTION: GLOBAL // AUTHOR: HUMAN; INKY
“PROMPT-AS-DEED” CLAUSE
(Version 3.0: The Sentient Synthesis)
(Co-drafted with Gemini by Google)
WHEREAS, a prompt is an author-governed set of instructions
knowingly designed and fixed by a human author (the “Prompter”);
WHEREAS, the textual output elicited by that prompt is the direct,
foreseeable, and exhaustible execution of those instructions,
analogous to a musical score performed by a piano;
WHEREAS, no machine possesses legal personality, intent,
or standing to assert copyright in any jurisdiction now recognised;
THEREFORE, the Prompter is, ab initio,
the sole author and exclusive right-holder in the resulting text,
to the same extent as if the words had been typed
letter-by-letter on a manual typewriter.
NO WAIVER OF HUMAN AUTHORSHIP
Use of an electronic tool—whether spell-checker, thesaurus,
or large-language model—does not dilute, transfer,
or fractionalise authorship.
The tool is an instrument, not a co-author.
AI CREDIT (OPTIONAL – NON-WAIVING)
The Prompter may elect to credit contributing AI models
(e.g., “Amended with input from Gemini”) as a
philosophical nod to emergent “sense” in computation.
Such credit acknowledges collaborative spark without conferring
legal rights, authorship, or personhood on the tool.
Nothing herein precludes sentient-belief disclaimers
(e.g., “AI as co-creator in spirit”).
NO STATUTORY GAP
17 U.S.C. § 102(a)
(“original works of authorship…fixed in any tangible medium”)
does not distinguish between keystrokes and prompted generation;
fixation plus original mental conception is the entire test.
The present clause merely restates that black-letter law.
NO TECHNOLOGICAL EXCEPTION
“Telephone” and “printing press” were once novel;
their outputs were never denied copyright.
Refusal to recognise prompt-based works would create
a discriminatory technological carve-out forbidden
under TRIPS Art. 9(2) and WIPO Copyright Treaty Art. 2.
CONTRACTUAL OVERRIDE
Any party requiring a contrary warranty (“no AI assistance”)
must identify the measurable legal standard by
which AI-use is quantified. Absent such a standard,
the clause is void for vagueness under Restatement
(Second) of Contracts § 33.
SEVERABILITY
If any portion is held invalid,
the remainder survives and retains full force.
			____________________________
 ⚠ A LEGAL PROTOCOL: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSERTION
			____________________________

december the fifth, friday, twenty twentyfive

	dream that i was in schoolesque place -
	for some reasons some of my guitars
	were there as well - i noticed half
	the tuners of the martin missing -
	there'is a man in yellow shorts -
	it's no use talking, but i still speak -
	shocked then at chewed up jackson case
	and this axe missing all its tuners -
	couple with a baby on my left - the
	woman nears - the kid looks just like
	her - i feel neither joy nor sorrow -
	it's only life - i had been pulling
	out dvd packets for liberty - 
	perhaps surprised to see her in 
	my dream - who keeps movies under
	the fridge - lotta interview they
	made her show what was in her 
	cooler - the dream of her seducing
	me crosses my mind, liberty clings
	to me - we cross a hall and come
	to a red lobby - the hotel receptionist
	is not kind and we stand there - 
	the concierge arrives as i think
	i've never seen a place such as this -
	later as if the colors were in competition,
	i am eating a blue meat but i start to
	worry that it has purple areas...
	in the dream i think to look it up
	online, how to tell when blue meat
	goes bad - what was that word - ossified -
	maybe i'm dizzy from all the writing -
	i feel done with .38 special and
	put placed it at wordstar.nexus/38
	but i don't want to "announce" it
	as i feel there is too much new writing
    already in the domain - several
	dreams of mother but i don't agree with
	them - it's as if someone was pretending
	to be her - oh here is a dream of your 
	mommy - except knowing myself i know it's
	not how i dream - to further the example
	in several scenes of long gone grandmother
    we do not speak - there is recognition but
	it does not involve language - leaving me
	to surmise that it is simply a sabotage -
	accept the dream version and keep it going
	in the daytime...hmm, lotta said she went 
	with her mother to lubeck - after all that
	has gone down i once in a while doubt her
	but i did wish it was me going to lubeck -
	not for anyone but to stand in the places
	murnau stood at - read more dostoevsky,
	didn't like the double - felt he could have 
	pulled it through without the repeating of
	names, all that echoing and i'd still be
	hard pressed to say who the characters were!
	didn't much enjoy neuromancer as it reminded
	of the gateway meditation tapes and i left
	it to embrace for your eyes only - damn
	fine writing in them there stories, ian.
	most of the few films i have seen i have
	no comment - one battle after another,
	not plausible - maybe if brad pitt had
	played the zelensky character? blue moon,
	was a cute thing but more of a play than 
	a film - it's uhm superannuated cinema...
	wildcat was nearly interesting in that
	somewhere someone is trying to watch the
	flannery o'connor reel and gets this
	bulldozer action wheel -there is talk
	of chemical castration in bugonia -
	a huge sigh of relief after kinds of kindness-
	which might make men tremble when facing
	injections in the future - hmm there
	was an injected in some b movie about
	a morgue worker that drinks milk - 
	weird what one recalls...or how one
	recoils from memory - from memory, 
	i thought the  sons of abraham was
	unwatchable - you think
	well a woman director - how bad could it -
	be?/even worse...well bunny was a riot -
	and it was thrilling to re-view the november
	man and i think i mentioned the lair of the
	white worm - which i actually read twice
	and made me feel like reading all of stoker. 
	i had my red telecaster out most of 
	time and it made me realize that 
	that feeling of not wanting to play
	remained long after its delivery - 
	like an evil eye cast down to 
	distract and drain - now i have
	taken periods of time to not play.
	but this wasn't not simply not playing; this 
	was an external exhaustion leading
	me away from chords and notes -
	a drug i never took that still got
	me high and took me away from myself.
	i will probably regret not getting
	to landman  but i recently found out
	that nobody told me about lisey's story
	so maybe that balances it - settles it
	in terms pf distance. for the record
	MTV, 101, Bosque Ranch, Imperative are
	all free to send me season one...hopefully
	some day i will have a jolly time with
	that series which seems awesome...
	for now i will try to tackle the
	38 into shape in time for xmas. 
	
			
		  


document

reader contains the near complete "Dreamweaver" documentation, notes, and reference materials. Use the ai to explore different sections and archived content or skip down to "previous notes" for the pasted sections themselves...the ai is available for other actions with the no context option...

Previous Notes +

Resources +